I think Doug’s purpose & strategy is to Debunk the
Power that traditional religions Still Hold over people. He’s trying to
get people to REALIZE what kind of a “God” they are worshipping.
Again & again this
pointless, useless, endless cycle of debating what an allegedly fictional
character in an alleged novel is “REALLY” like?!? This pointless, useless,
endless cycle of debating has been going-on LITERALLY for thousands of years. Does
any sane person really think that a few more arguments will now resolve the
whole issue? REALLY?!? Don’t y’all see that it’s pointless, useless, endless? Both
scientifically-UNPROVABLE, faith-based, religious-doctrine extremists will just
continue their pointless, useless, endless debates ad-nauseam (Latin term for a
discussion that has continued so long that it has continued to the point of
nausea). How many more time do I need to quote this:
“You never change things by
fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a
new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”― R. Buckminster Fuller
SHOW ME THE TANGIBLE that
ATHEISTians have built as a group, that is constructive, positive, HAPPY,
edifying, socially-redeeming. Enough already of pointless, useless, endless
debates. No, don’t point out some achiever who built something constructive on
his own, who just happens to misinformedly label himself an Atheist. Show me
what Atheist societies have built. Show me some great thing built that has the
Atheist emblem on it and a plaque that this GREAT achievement was built by
Unified-Atheist-League,
Allied-Atheist-Alliance, or
United-Atheist-Alliance.
FOR-SCIENCE-SAKE, build
something; build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete, and FOR-SCIENCE-SAKE,
stop pointless, useless, endless debates pitifully trying to prove that
extremist, scientifically-UNPROVABLE, faith-based, religious-doctrine of
ATHEISTianity (which is no better than theism).
~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~
~~~~~ ~~~~~
He’s speaking in Their belief systems—trying to REASON
with them. He’s trying to break through the brainwashing of acceptance of
such a “God”—stating that a “God” who is so egotistical is not worthy of their
worship. He’s trying to get them to question their unquestioning
beliefs.
FOR-SCIENCE-SAKE, why?? Yes,
WHY?? Why “try
to get them to question their unquestioning beliefs”??
“To change something, build a
new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”― R. Buckminster Fuller
... and the wise ones will see
it & come over.
~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~
~~~~~ ~~~~~
Traditional evangelicals base everything on the
Assumption that “God” exists.
And just how is it better that
traditional ATHEISTians “base everything on the assumption that God [doesn’t]
exist”. Neither
ASSUMPTION is SCIENTIFICALLY-provable. So I say, both extremists should shut
the f_ _k up until some truly, scientificly-verifiable evidence can be presented,
and instead of fighting this theist-Atheist Crusade-Jihad, focus on non-issue, Naturalist-Nontheist,
building of communities of courteous-cooperation.
~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~
~~~~~ ~~~~~
So; he’s stating that such a “God” would not be worthy of
their worship—because an egomaniacal “God” is not a loving “God”—but a “God”
who has a psychological sickness: Ego.
“Show me someone w/o an ego,
and I’ll show you a loser”.—Donald Trump
Yes, I proudly quote
The-Donald. While others just blow hot-air with no MEASURABLE evidence that
they know what they are talking about, for 40 yrs he has been providing livelihood
for people willing to work; 22,450 employees at present. I hold a double Master’s
(psych & religions). What psychological degrees of qualifications does the
writer have to pontificate about the ego? Everyone thinks they can tell a neurosurgeon
how surgery on the brain should be done. And what economic evidence does the
writer have that proves that they are equal or superior to The-Donald in
benefiting 22,450+ workers willing to work? Are they listed among the
Forbes-400?
~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~
~~~~~ ~~~~~
Someone who is healthy emotionally & psychologically
does not have an ego problem. They are not “insanely” jealous, for
example.
And ATHEISTians are known
world-wide as exhibiting “healthy emotional psychology”?
Certain theist groups may be
very deluded, but they have world-wide reputations for being extremely honest
to deal with. Why don’t ATHEISTians AS A GROUP, have such a reputation? Why
have they proven themselves in history as being blood-thirsty
Jihad-Inquisitors?
~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~
~~~~~ ~~~~~
